Review



m1 macrophage generation medium xf  (PromoCell)


Bioz Verified Symbol PromoCell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol PromoCell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    PromoCell m1 macrophage generation medium xf
    M1 Macrophage Generation Medium Xf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 47 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophage generation medium xf/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 47 article reviews
    m1 macrophage generation medium xf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    98
    ATCC m1 macrophages
    M1 Macrophages, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophages/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell m1 macrophage generation medium xf
    M1 Macrophage Generation Medium Xf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophage generation medium xf/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 macrophage generation medium xf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell m1 macrophages
    M1 Macrophages, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophages/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC m1 phenotype macrophages
    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
    M1 Phenotype Macrophages, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 phenotype macrophages/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 phenotype macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    PromoCell m2 m csf cells c 12914 c 12915 respectively
    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
    M2 M Csf Cells C 12914 C 12915 Respectively, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m2 m csf cells c 12914 c 12915 respectively/product/PromoCell
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m2 m csf cells c 12914 c 12915 respectively - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell macrophages
    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
    Macrophages, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophages/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    PromoCell m1 m2 macrophage generation medium
    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
    M1 M2 Macrophage Generation Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 m2 macrophage generation medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 m2 macrophage generation medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell m1 macrophage generation medium
    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
    M1 Macrophage Generation Medium, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophage generation medium/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    m1 macrophage generation medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h (M1 macrophages). miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Dual metabolic-inflammation modulation in MicroRNA@neutrophil-derived microvesicles achieve robust osteoarthritis therapy

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.09.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h (M1 macrophages). miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.

    Article Snippet: To obtain M1 phenotype macrophages, RAW264.7 was treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) (Invitrogen, CA, USA) for 24 h. L929 mouse fibroblast cells were purchased from the ATCC and grown at 37 °C with 5% CO 2 for 7 days in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Labeling, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control